7/13/2023 0 Comments Second life for mac 10.4.11![]() ![]() With a higher install base than Coda, and a much broader set of users - from web developers, to printing presses, to press photographers, to who knows what - the Transmit results are a bit different.ġ7% still on 10.4. This makes sense for web developers, who, for the most part, really should be using the latest Safari.īut one chart, and one app, doesn’t tell the full story… The Leopard/Snow Leopard dominance is strong, and it seems like Coda users are pretty adamant about running the latest and greatest. CodaĬoda users are famously cutting-edge, and this chart reflects it. I took the last week’s worth of data - including repeat launches, of course, but mathematically I think it all evens out, which is to say I’m terrible at math and have no idea if that’s true - and made two charts. The additional bonus of this (fully anonymous) data is that is gives us a very good look at where our users are, and lets us plan accordingly. I honestly detest having to install Windows software just to do what the MacBook Pro should be able to do in the first place.When some of our apps check for updates, they send along the Mac OS X version number, helpful in case we need to send a message to a specific set of OS users. Set up Boot Camp, buy an OEM version of Windows XP SP 2 for $100.00, download and install Second Life on that partition and hope that the improvement in performance and frame rate is worth the investment and hassle. Wait for Apple to release further Leopard updates and hope that one of them will allow me to run Second Life properlyĢ. Now, with the upgrade to Leopard, I can't even stand and text chat with 2 other sl residents without the spinning ball coming up repeatedly.ġ. I did have Second Life running very smoothly in Tiger and actually was able to use the Windlight version. I have an older MacBook Pro - it is the 2.0 Ghz model with upgraded ram (1.5 Gigs now) and the X1600 card. I am really sorry to hear about your new MacBook Pro - I honestly find it hard to believe that a brand new, top of the line laptop is incapable of running a program like Second life that a PC laptop 1/3 the price of the MBP can !! PS: Looking for an SL 'Think Different' T-shirt. I think ya gotta have cubic video ram to be a happy camper on SL, no pun intended. If you use the windlight viewer these afore mentioned problems are amplified in my opinion. It's much better if I run SL in a squinchy little window, but even then its a newbie bumping into stuff and extended times waiting for grey things to rezz.ĭon't get me started about the spinning beachball. I have run SL on a Dual 1.25Ghz G4 thats got a 128MB video card in it. I really notice the difference between the two computers.Īs an aside. Blew that bad boy off and no more screwy vid issues and best of all. It happened literally dozens of times before I figured out that the graphics card was covered with dust and overheating while zooming a fast car around the Mooz racetrack, for example. In addition, I too have experienced the hard shutdown issue described by Crystal above when using my MacPro tower, even with 512MB video card. I believe the graphics IS getting taxed considerably when in-world.ĭo your frame rates improve when you reduce the size of the viewer window? If so. SL runs pretty slow for me compared to my MacPro tower unit. I'm running SL in a nearly full screen window on my MacBook Pro 17 and I find the fans ramp up almost immediately after I log in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |